TREATING NAVY SEALs LIKE TERRORISTS AND TERRORISTS LIKE CITIZENS

UPSIDE DOWN, POLITICALLY-CORRECT

INJUSTICE AGAINST NAVY SEALS

Forgive me for not writing about this earlier, but I had to cool my outrage long enough to complete a non-profanity laden sentence. I'm still not quite sure that I can accomplish this challenging feat, but here goes...

If you're like me, you're still reeling about the menacing decision by Attorney General, Eric Holder, who seems to side frequently in favor of terrorists, to give terrorists captured in a time of war, the same constitutional rights that U. S. citizens enjoy. As out of the realm of being believable that abominable and treasonous decision was, I really thought that it couldn't get any worse. Well, it has. I am beyond livid.

WELCOME TO OBAMA'S WORLD

If you haven't read the story, allow me to give a non-detailed, brief summary:

The terrorist who is believed to be responsible for the brutal death and mutilation of four U.S. security guards was supposedly given a "fat lip" by Navy SEALs, who are now being charged with assault. That's it. Poor baby! They can burn and mutilate our guys, drag their dead, burnt bodies through the streets, hang them from a bridge (all things they did in this case), and we've reached the point where a fat lip is the moral equivalent and is considered a war crime. God help us!

Welcome to the backwards world of Barack Obama and his limp-wristed government. In Barack's World, terrorists are given constitutional rights, while citizens' rights and freedoms are taken away. Terrorists are tried as civilians and our military are tried as war criminals. Welcome to Obama's World.

Why would anyone want to defend this country under this Commander? My Lord Almighty! We have an America-hating, terrorist-loving Attorney General, Eric Holder, who when asked if he would read Osama bin Laden his rights should he be captured, he said, after much hesitation, "it depends." (SEE VIDEO)

It depends! On what? What scenario could possibly warrant a non-U.S. citizen, a terrorist no less, caught on foreign soil in the time of war, being given constitutional rights?

The last sentence of the FOX News story, possibly unknowingly, reveals the reason such disgraceful acts are allowed to stand:

The military is sensitive to charges of detainee abuse highlighted in the AbuGhraib prison scandal. The Navy charged four SEALs with abuse in 2004 in connection with detainee treatment.

Thanks for that liberal "Hope and Change" Democrats. Thanks go to you too "sensitive", hypocritical media-types like Keith Olbermann and Rachel Maddow, who feigned "moral outrage" over how the poor terrorists were treated at AbuGhraib.

This is the upside-down world you've created, turning our brave, tough as guts military, whose former objective was "to kill bad guys and break things" into de-balled, feminized, feel-good sensitivity zones of political correctness. Have fun protecting yourself because our brave and heroic military, once feared, admired, and respected by both friends and foes, has now been officially neutered by a bunch of ACORN and ACLU attorneys.

Our country will not survive three years of these ultra politically-correct types running our country.

"Tolerance and Apathy are the Last Virtues of a Dying Society"

-- ARISTOTLE

For easy access to other recent articles, click on "THE FREEDOM POST" at the very top of the site, then page down.